2025年6月21日雅思写作考试已经结束，小编搜集整理了本次雅思写作task2范文：是否支持新建房屋与当地老房屋风格一致，供雅思考生参考。

　　WRITING TASK 2　　

　　Some people think the newly built houses should be the same as the old houses in local areas. Others argue that local authorities should allow people to build houses in their own style. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

　　建议思路：

　　支持新建房屋与当地老房屋风格一致

　　1. 文化传承：老房屋是当地历史文化的载体，统一风格能保留独特建筑风貌和传统工艺，增强居民文化认同感与归属感。

　　2. 视觉和谐：统一风格使城市或乡村景观更协调美观，避免风格杂乱破坏整体美感。

　　3. 社区凝聚力：相似建筑风格有助于形成紧密社区，居民因共同环境产生共鸣，促进邻里交流互动，增强社区凝聚力。

　　支持人们按自己风格建造房屋

　　1. 个性表达：房屋是个人生活空间，自由风格能满足居民个性化需求，展现个人品味与生活态度，使居住环境更舒适满意。

　　2. 建筑创新：鼓励自由风格可推动建筑设计创新，引入新技术和理念，为城市带来新颖独特景观，提升城市形象与吸引力。

　　3. 适应现代生活：不同家庭对房屋功能需求不同，自由风格能更好满足现代生活多样化需求，如家庭办公、健身空间等。

　　个人观点

　　可在一定规划和规范下，允许居民有一定风格自由。地方政府制定建筑指导原则，规定新建房屋需保留当地传统建筑的部分元素，如色彩、材料、屋顶形式等，同时在内部布局和部分外观细节上给予居民创新空间，实现传统与现代融合，既传承文化又满足个性需求。

　　In conclusion, 建筑风格一致能够促进文化传承和视觉和谐度，增进社区凝聚力，但是按自己的喜好建造房屋能够促进革新表达和建筑创新，更能适应现代生活。政府可以在适当规定部分元素的情况下允许居民自主创新，从而更好的促进当地的文化发展。

　　The debate over whether new houses should match traditional local architecture or reflect individual tastes is ongoing. While preserving cultural heritage and community cohesion are important, allowing personal design freedom can foster innovation and meet modern needs. I believe a balanced approach—combining guidelines with creative space—is ideal.

　　On one hand, matching new houses to old ones helps protect a region’s cultural identity. Historic buildings serve as tangible records of local customs, and a unified architectural style ensures these traditions endure. For example, in many European towns, strict regulations require new constructions to use local stone and maintain roof shapes to ensure the town’s distinctive character. Moreover, consistency in design enhances visual harmony. Streets lined with similar style create a pleasing environment, whereas a mixed styles can appear chaotic. Such uniformity also strengthens community bonds, as residents feel a shared connection to their surroundings and are more likely to engage in neighborhood activities.

　　On the other hand, allowing poeple to build in their own style encourages architectural innovation and personal expression. A home reflects its owner’s personality and lifestyle, and freedom in design can lead to more comfortable, functional living spaces. For instance, a family needing a home office and gym might prefer a modern layout with large windows and open interiors, which traditional styles cannot accommodate. Furthermore, creative architecture can revitalize a city’s image, which could attract tourists and new residents. Iconic buildings often become landmarks precisely because they stand out from historic surroundings.

　　In my view, local authorities should establish clear building guidelines that preserve key elements of traditional architecture, while allowing flexibility in interior layouts and non-essential exterior details. This approach maintains cultural continuity and aesthetic cohesion without stifling individuality or modern innovation.

　　In conclusion, while uniform architectural styles promote cultural heritage and community harmony, personal design freedom drives innovation and suits contemporary lifestyles. By combining heritage-based regulations with allowances for creative expression, governments can achieve both preservation and progress.

　　写作词汇

【最新雅思考试机经-点击免费领取】

【雅思免费试听课-0元领取】

【雅思全真模考-免费-点击进入】

【雅思水平测试-免费】

【雅思口语题库-免费下载PDF版本】