Narrator: Listen to part of a lecture in a marketing class.
旁白:听一段市场营销课程讲座。
Professor: And that wraps up our discussion of how the retail sector, uh, ways in which retail managers deal with customer complaints.
教授:到此我们关于零售业是如何……零售业经理如何处理客户投诉的方法就讲完了。
So let's shift now to the service sector, which markets not goods but services, intangibles like transportation, food service, career counseling...
那么我们现在来说说服务业吧,服务业营销的不是商品而是服务,也可以说是无形的商品,比如交通,餐饮服务,职业咨询……
Oh, there are literally hundreds of examples.
要说的话也有数百个例子。
Service providers must, of course, constantly strive to meet customers' needs.
服务者当然必须要不断努力满足顾客的需求。
But as in retail, there are instances of service failure in which the customer is dissatisfied, uh, perhaps to the point of not doing business with you anymore.
但是和零售业一样,服务业会出现服务失败的情况。这种情况下,顾客会不满,可能会严重到再也不和你做生意的程度。
Some service failures are beyond an organization's control, like, uh, computer malfunction that leads to missed deadlines.
一些服务失败并不在一个团队的控制范围内,比如电脑故障导致错过了截止时间。
Other failures stem from process problems, like inadequate training for newly-hired employees.
其他失败源于流程问题,比如对新雇员培训不足。
Then there's human error.
然后就是人为失误。
Okay, imagine you manage a car rental agency.
想象一下你管理一家汽车租赁公司。
A customer calls in a reservation, but your employee marks down the wrong date.
一个顾客打电话来预约,但是你的一个员工记错了日期。
So your customer arrives and guess what, the size car he reserved isn't available.
等你的顾客光临时你猜怎么,他预定的车型没有了。
But your customer is less concerned about the source of the failure than the solution: what you do about it; what sort of compensation; what service recovery you give.
但是比起错误来源,你的顾客更关心解决方案:你会怎么处理这件事?你会提供怎样的补偿?怎么样的服务补救措施?
So if you are in the service industry, as a marketer, you always need some kind of service recovery plan.
所以如果你在服务行业,作为一个市场营销人员,你一直都需要某种服务补救方案。
Your plan must be in place before a failure occurs and it must also be communicated promptly to everyone in your organization who deals with customers so they'll know what to do.
你的计划必须在失败发生之前就到位,而且必须及时传达给你组织中所有与客户打交道的人,这样他们就知道该怎么做了。
Service recovery encompasses all the actions taken to get a disappointed customer back to, uh, well, back to a state of satisfaction.
服务补救要包含为了一位失望的顾客重新回到,呃……回到满意状态而采取的所有行动。
So if your car rental agency couldn't provide the size car your customer wanted, but your policy is to provide a roomier car for the same price.
所以如果你的汽车租赁公司无法提供顾客想要的车型,但是你们的政策是可以用相同的价格提供一辆更宽敞的车。
Your customer would probably be happy, might even restore his faith in your company.
你的顾客可能会很满意,甚至也许会重塑他对你公司的信任。
Research has in fact identified service recovery as a significant determinant of customer loyalty.
实际上,研究将服务补救确定为带来顾客忠诚度的一个重要决定因素。
Student: I see what you mean.
学生:我知道你什么意思。
Every year, my family goes on vacation together.
每年我的家人都会一起去度假。
And a few summers ago, when we were in Chicago, it was really really hot.
几年前夏天,我们去了芝加哥,那里非常非常热。
And guess what, the hotel's air conditioning broke and everyone was complaining.
而且你猜怎么的?旅馆的空调坏了,每个人都在投诉。
What the hotel did... they actually didn't charge anybody for that weekend.
旅馆做的是……他们真的没有收那个周末的费用。
But the funny thing is that even though we had that horrible experience at that hotel, because they were so quick to appease us, we usually stay at that same hotel every time we go to Chicago.
但是搞笑的是,即使我们在那个旅馆有了那么糟糕的体验,但是因为他们很迅速地对我们做出了安抚,我们每次去芝加哥的时候通常还是会在那个旅馆。
Professor: Great example!
教授:非常棒的例子。
So in this case that hotel chain might consider itself the beneficiary of the so-called service recovery paradox.
所以在这个案例中,这个连锁旅馆也许把它自己看做了所谓的服务补救反论的受益方。
Um, the paradox basically implies that customers who experience a service failure, well, they could potentially be made more loyal than customers who were satisfied in the first place if an equitable recovery occurred after the failure.
这个反论主要是指体验了服务失败的顾客……如果在失败发生后接受了公正的补救的话,他们可能会比那些一开始就很满意的顾客更加忠诚。
Yes, Ben?
怎么了,Ben?
Student: Wait a minute.
学生:等一下。
If a good service recovery creates more loyalty than, um, if things went smoothly from the get-go, why don't companies like make mistakes on purpose so?
如果一个好的服务补救比事情从一开始就顺利进行更能带来忠诚度,那企业为什么不故意犯一些错误,这样……?
Professor: So you could implement a recovery plan that leave your customers delighted as opposed to merely satisfied?
教授:这样你就能实施一个补救方案让你的顾客更加高兴,而不只是满意而已?
Look, it's always better to do things right the first time 'cause how can you know that the paradox will hold true in every situation?
听我说,第一次就把事情做对永远更好,因为你怎么知道这个反论在每种情况下都适用呢?
Plus, it's hard to predict if a good service recovery will overcome the negative effect of a service failure, and what about all those failures that never come to your attention?
另外,很难预言好的补救措施能胜过服务失败的负面影响,而且那些你从没注意到的失败怎么办?
Because statistically about 50 percent of the customers don't complain about service failures, at least not to the service provider.
因为就统计到的情况而言,大约50%的顾客不会对服务失败进行投诉,至少不会对服务提供者投诉。
But negative word of mouth, now, that's got worse implications for your business.
但是坏口碑对你的生意影响更坏。
Also, you'd have to pay your employees to execute the service a second time.
还有,你得付钱让你的员工进行第二次服务。
Typically, a service recovery is gonna involve some kind of compensation, right?
通常服务补救会包括某种补偿,对吧?
So it is gonna cost your company some money that you are going have to account for in your budget.
所以这会让你的公司损失一些钱,而你必须的在你的预算中为这笔费用负责。
I've actually been researching some of these issues myself 'cause what we need is a deeper understanding of customers' thought processes and their reactions to service recoveries.
事实上,我自己一直在研究其中的这些问题,因为我们需要更深层理解顾客的思维过程和他们对服务补救措施的反应。
How do consumers form expectations?
顾客是如何形成期待的?
How do they react to different service recovery tactics?
他们对不同的服务补救策略作何反应?
Can we predict how any given customer will react to a given service failure?
我们能预计任何指定顾客对指定的服务失败的反应吗?
People's expectations, their priorities vary.
人们的期待,他们优先考虑的事各不相同。
Like uh, if I am in a hurry, and the French fries I ordered at a fast food restaurant aren't piping hot.
比如说,假如我很赶时间,而我在一家快餐店点的薯条不是很热。
I might not complain 'cause I got them fast.
我可能也不会不满,因为我很快拿到了他们。
But if I am not in a hurry, I might return the fries even if I had to wait for a fresh batch.
但是如果我不赶时间,即使我在下一批薯条新鲜出锅之前要等一会,我也会把薯条退回去。
题型分类:细节题
题干分析:根据fast-food restaurant定位
选项分析:
这里professor的观点是顾客对于服务过失的接受程度根据自己的实际情况发生变化。比如,着急点薯条的时候就不会计较薯条的温度,不着急的时候是会要求退换的,因此对应B选项。
A选项:与原文逻辑矛盾,一定是从客户的角度入手,而不是服务提供商的角度;
C选项:文中没有提到;
D选项:文中没有提到。
上一题
Official 42 Lec 3下一题
Official 41 Con 1