Now listen and answer questions 25 to 30.

现在请听录音，并回答第25至第30题。

PHIL: While you're here, can we talk about the list of resources we have to evaluate for the seminar tomorrow. I've had a look at them all, but it's been a bit of a rush.

菲尔：既然你在，我们能谈谈明天研讨会需要评估的资源清单吗？我都看了，但有点仓促。

LUCY: Yeah. What did you think of that article on invasive lionfish? The one claiming they were expanding their habitat throughout the Mediterranean Sea.

露西：是的，你觉得那篇关于入侵狮子鱼的文章怎么样？就是那篇声称它们正在整个地中海扩张栖息地的文章。

PHIL: Well, the writer went on about how dangerous they were in environmental terms, which is probably true, but he didn't really provide much information to explain why.

菲尔：嗯，作者大篇幅讲述了它们在环境方面的危害性，这可能是真的，但他并没有提供太多信息来解释原因。

LUCY: I know what you mean.

露西：我明白你的意思。

PHIL: I watched the documentary on microplastics, at least I started to, but then I found it was made ten years ago so I gave up.

菲尔：我看了关于微塑料的纪录片，至少开始看了，但后来发现是十年前拍的，所以就放弃了。

LUCY: I watched to the end but you're right, it was showing its age. People had hardly heard of microplastics then, whereas now everyone knows about them and how dangerous they are.

露西：我看到了最后，但你说得对，它已经过时了。那时人们几乎没听说过微塑料，而现在每个人都知道它们以及它们有多危险。

PHIL: Yeah. Did you listen to the podcast on ocean pollution?

菲尔：是的，你听了那个关于海洋污染的播客吗？

LUCY: Mm. I didn't get anything out of it though. Most of it was stating the obvious.

露西：嗯，我没从中得到什么收获，大部分内容都是在陈述显而易见的事情。

PHIL: Yes, it mentioned pesticides and plastic and things, and it clearly made the point that they were a bad thing, but everybody knows that anyway.

菲尔：是的，它提到了农药和塑料等，并明确指出它们是有害的，但这是人人都知道的事。

PHIL: Did you read that book on coastal ecosystems?

菲尔：你读了那本关于沿海生态系统的书吗？

LUCY: The one by John Harper? Yes, I found it hard going at first, it went into a lot of detail about things like the effects of offshore windfarms and fish farms, but actually I ended up with a much better understanding of the issues.

露西：约翰·哈珀写的那本？是的，我起初觉得很难读，它详细介绍了海上风电场和养鱼场的影响等内容，但最终我对这些问题有了更深入的理解。

PHIL: Yes, I agree and I thought it was a well-written summary of those. And the diagrams helped a lot too.

菲尔：是的，我同意，我觉得这是对这些问题写得很好的总结，图表也帮了很大忙。

LUCY: The article on metal toxicity was way above my head, I didn't know anything about how metals from industrial emissions react in the ocean... and I still don't understand it.

露西：关于金属毒性的文章对我来说太难了，我对工业排放中的金属在海洋中如何反应一无所知……现在仍然不理解。

PHIL: I gave up reading after the first chapter – I just couldn't follow it.

菲尔：我看完第一章就放弃了——根本看不懂。

LUCY: That podcast on floating marine cities was interesting, though it presented a rather one-sided picture, I thought.

露西：那个关于海上浮动城市的播客很有趣，不过我觉得它呈现的画面相当片面。

PHIL: Yes, it focused on how this would benefit people and ignored the effects on the environment.

菲尔：是的，它专注于这对人类的好处，忽视了对环境的影响。